VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Cactus Jack who wrote (17488)	11/17/2000 5:45:19 PM
From: William Brotherson	Read Replies (1) of 65232

jpgill, Don't get me wrong, I agree with you totally. The Supreme Court has to find wrong doing to change anything. The fact that they may disagree with her is not enough, there has to be something wrong which the judge this morning has said she did not because the only thing she "COULD" do wrong was go against his order, "HIS ORDER", and he himself ruled she did not. The Supreme Court may be actually seeing to it that there can be no more challanges because if they didn't at least hear the case, then there may be some form of relief in the Federal level which they have now cut off ??? Hmmmmmmm ???? wb

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next