VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ex-INTCfan who wrote (17473)	11/17/2000 6:29:18 PM
From: Dr. Id	Read Replies (1) of 65232

I'd love to hear from any thread members who have no strong feelings for either candidate -- what do they think about hand recounts in this process? I was not for either (thought to be honest I've been concerned about someone as mentally challenged as Bush being President). A supervised hand recount where both parties are monitoring the recount seems like the fairest solution as it will determine the true will of the voters. A machine recount by an inaccurate machine (which discards ballots in the same manner each time) is not a valid or reliable measurement. If Bush truly won Florida, why is he afraid of a supervised hand recount? Dr.Id@seemsobvioustome.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next