I read that article Jim. IMO, the author was clearly biased, but the media seems to be unable to report in a balanced manner these days. Doesn't change the theories & statistical evidence presented IMO.
The stat guy made many compelling arguments that could indicate mischief.... or outright fraud. Only read it once, but a couple of his theories seemed weak or hard to prove, although the main arguments indicate too many statistical anomalies to be ignored IMVHO. Some of these anomalies in PBC were extreme, not only for Florida, but nationwide. Might have a better chance of one person receiving 30 lightning strikes than what occurred in PBC. Now that's way out of whack. Why?
As an auditor, I understand how to find the trail..... if one exists...... & if so, expose it for all to see..... simply follow his deductions & review the ballots to see if the underlying hard data exist in support of these theories. Interview up the chain from those with hands on duties to oversight/supervisors & select voters, etc.
Examples..... the ballots..... are almost all double punches being.... bush + gore..... & ....bush + buchanan.... is the voting pattern on the rest of the ballot consistent with the prez selection(s), etc., etc., etc. Conduct interviews with poll officials & voters...... Continue to gather evidence & focus in/expand the review if sample review shows/supports irregularities. Conduct follow-up interviews after refining exactly who said what..... compare/contrast interview info against the hard evidence reviews to expose conflicting information. Follow up interviews (possibly all) will be in the presence of SA's. Ask hard, direct questions & give the interviewee plenty of room to hang themselves...... with their own words..... this would begin to bring sweat on the brows of those who my have been, 'er, um........... naughty. Low level dudes & dudettes may want to save their fannies if they had direct involvement. In any event, such a review would point, or not, to a smoking gun.
This is stuff I use to live & breathe for.
Ö¿Ö |
