Yes, Re: "That is hypocrisy at it's upmost. And at its heart, there lies the VERY REASON that Gore's request for a manual recount is unjustifiable...."
Gore had the opportunity to recognize what had to be glaringly obvious. Vote additive hand-count methods must be employed equally across both candidates territories, to be equitable(it might SEEM it is obvius to him now, given his offer the other day- but if I'm lyin' I'm dyin', it's clear he still thinks getting his territory in alone ought provide for a fair result in the minds of Americans. Pardon me, but is he nuts?--what a boner he's made here, and I can see it in his eyes, it is dawning on him...if HE gets elected now given his agressively unfair actions here, he's toast, and clearly would have the toughest time of the two- his actions here are highly discrediting, and it can't help but be clear, in time, to most reasonable people).
F*&^%$# talking heads, HOW can Gore be claimed to have sought a truthful process when he clearly has greedily sought only his own vote gain, FIRST and without due consideration, clearly, for fairness.
Dan B |
