PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: E who wrote (80623)	11/18/2000 1:37:18 AM
From: Scrapps	Read Replies (1) of 769667

Okay it's time to be honest and straight about the recount. Disclosure: I'm a Rep. who voted for Bush. Now.... I concede a manual recount is the absolute best way to recount if certain criteria are met first. A) The very first recount is by hand. Not the second, the third, the forth or any time after that. B) All ballots get recounted not those picked by the apparent winner or loser. This means state wide in a case such as Fl. when the winner was called early and incorrectly...who knows how many times. C) Multiple recounts are not allowed since it's possible to spoil ballots by re-handling them, thus rendering the will of the voter void. D) The canvassing boards are re-adjusted on recounts to assure the voter that NOT only two people are in charge on recounts. Or that all ballots that are questionable are moved to another group of 7 people to judge separately. _______________________________________________________ The Bush camp is not really against the hand recounts IMO, it's that the hand recounts are coming as the third or forth count and the more the ballots are handled the less accurate they become. It gives the appearance that the more they are counted the more they are manipulated.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next