Rande Is . . . HOME Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: maverick61 who wrote (41697)	11/18/2000 1:48:10 AM
From: maverick61	Read Replies (1) of 57584

As far as proof of what that Op/ed piece alleges - their have been numerous articles out there, not only describing potentially fraudulent actions, but also several that note that what is going on in FLA flies in the face of all laws of statistical probability. latimes.com reagan.com Some of the swings in the recount, county by county, which have not been attributed to initial mathematecal error, simply are too far outside the norm not to raise huge question marks with anyone well versed in mathematical study and statistical probability. Now, before anyone accuses me of being simply partisan - let me say that I believe there are errors and fraud everywhere. That is the nature of an election. Anyone who says there side does not cheat or try to take unfair advantage of circumstances just has blinders on. But if you ask me, its pretty apparent based on mathematical, annecdotal and other evidence that in Florida, the Democrats are simply doing a far better job of cheating, especially in this recount in areas their partisan supporters control than the Republicans.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next