SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (81684)11/19/2000 12:57:07 AM
From: Frank Griffin  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
Nadine, this manual recount is not in conformity with state law. There is an automatic recount if there is 1/2% of less difference between the loser and the winner. However, that is a machine recount like the second automatic recount that was done. The selective manual recount that is presently being done does not conform with state law. A manual recount is only legal if there is allegation of fraud or there is evidence the machine malfunctioned. Neither of those are at issue and so the count shouldn't be done. There is no provision for doing a recount based on voter stupidity or ineptness.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext