There you go again:
<<"1- The election itself (Bush won)">>
The OFFICIAL results of this are not complete. Three states have still not been certified. In the other 47 states plus DC, Gore maintains a 255 - 246 electoral vote lead and 200,000 +/- popular vote lead nationwide. How can you possibly call that a clear "Bush win"
<<"2- Gore asked for recount (Bush won)">>
As you continue to incorrectly insist, your #2 above was an AUTOMATIC recount in FL dictated by FL law and not requested by either candidate. Bush's lead was reduced significantly (from nearly 2000 to 300) as a result of this AUTOMATIC recount. [You're never going to accept this are you Vendit?]
<<"3- Gore asked for a second recount (Bush won)">>
This "second recount", which is Gore's FIRST request for a recount, is the manual count, guaranteed by FL law as a result of a 300 vote differential out of 6 million votes cast. This count has never been completed, you know it hasn't been completed, and you can't prove otherwise.
<<"4- Gore asks for hand recount (Bush will win)">>
This is redundancy on your part. Vendit. Your number 4 point is number 3, the "hand recount" that is still on-going. As I have stated before, this manual hand count has stopped, started,stopped and restarted as a result of on-going litigation. For some reason, every time it RESTARTS, you choose to call it a NEW count.
I must admit, you are a worthy adversary vendit. Your spin control is good, but let's try and get the facts straight every now and then.
TG |
