On Sept 28, you said
<INRG---shorts are toast...compares about the same as MCDT with only
one difference. INRG is in the mid 40's with 7.6M shares. MCDT is
in the 120's with 12.5M shares...Shares are float shares for both.>>
________________________________________________________________
On Nov 20, I said
INRG closed at 51 1/8 on Sept. 28. Today, Nov 20, it
is 16 1/8 bid. Looks like Longs, not Shorts, are toast.
____________________________________________
On Nov 21, you said
_________________
INRG--are you just stupid ? That happened to be a good value comparison at the time. The market
took this stock down. You called nothing. You could have taken a dart and done just as good on the
short side since Sept. FWIW,, I was not in it much during that fall and I am in the process of loading
up now. <<<gggg>>>
______________________________________________________________________________
If a stock which declines 70% in 7 weeks is a good value, please protect me from your POOR
values.
Actually, the bulk of my assets are in QLogic, which WAS a good value comparison
on Sept.28. On that date, QLGC was 93 7/8, and now, 7 weeks later QLGC is 102, up 9%.
Not great, but better than down 70% and I am satisfied.
Actually, INRG does look interesting now, at 16. But value, at 51?. I don't think so. |
