SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials
AMAT 252.25+0.9%Nov 28 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Robert O11/21/2000 11:15:44 AM
  Read Replies (1) of 70976
 
Is it just me or do many feel ZDNet and a few others of its ilk should be named the luddite times. I mean they seem always to be *negative* on tech. Smells like a hedge fund with its own web page and reporters to me. Start a magazine rating restaurants, then open your own give it 'five forks up' and complain everyone else in town's sauce sucks.

Anyway, complaint here is the VERY misleading title of story (which title appears on the news link). This is from earlier but still out here today via PRI story.) To use a super charged word like 'neutral' which has a very specific meaning for analysts in the title of a story in which even the anal-yst who sees the "business deteriorating" gives a BUY recommendation is misleading. Plus, reporter says reaction was lukewarm (my bolding) then goes on to report on three specific examples: all buy ratings.

November 16, 2000 11:13am

Applied Materials gets neutral analyst reactions

By Anand Ablack, Special to ZDII ZDII

Despite topping analyst estimates for its fourth quarter, Applied Materials (Nasdaq: AMAT) received lukewarm ratings from analysts.
Shares of the chip equipment giant rose 0.63 to 43.38.
In the fourth quarter, Applied Materials earned $664 million, or 77 cents a share, on sales of $2.92 billion, topping analyst earnings estimates by a penny. Sales were up 81 percent from the year-ago period, which saw the company earn $303 million, or 37 cents a share, on sales of $1.61 billion.

For the fiscal year, Applied Materials took in $2.05 billion, or $2.39 a share, on sales of $9.56 billion up from the $757 million, or 92 cents a share, earned on sales of $5.1 billion in fiscal 1999.

Analyst reaction was lukewarm.

Analyst M. Ali Irani at CIBC World Markets reiterated his "buy" rating.

Brett A. Hodess at Merrill Lynch reiterated near-term "accumulate," and kept a long-term rating of "buy." The target price was cut to $55 from $76 per share.

Wit SoundView analyst Michael O'Brien gave the company a "buy" rating, citing concerns over weakened demand. "As we look into the chip-end markets (computers, communication and consumers), we see demand... less robust than we would have anticipated and inventory building up," O'Brien wrote in a report. While maintaining year-over-year growth in revenues and earnings of 31 percent, the analyst noted that he believes that a "substantial amount" of risk exists.

He reiterated his conviction that the fundamentals of Applied Material's business were "deteriorating".

O'Brien set the share price target for the company at $42.75 and sees earnings for fiscal 2001 of $3.26.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext