Intel Corporation (INTC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)

INTC 40.51

-7.4%

3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Barry Grossman who wrote (118762)	11/21/2000 8:11:25 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) of 186894

Barry, Rethinking your question about the "dimpled" chads. I voted by the same punch card method. I suppose it is possible that someone could stick the stylus in the candidates hole, and push it down far enough to make an indentation in the cardboard, and at that precise moment change their mind and decide not to vote for that candidate. But I doubt it would happen very often. It seems much more likely that they intended that vote. The only time an election canvas would approve a ballot with a dimple is when there is not a punch at all for the other side. If you buy the argument that the intent of the voter is of the utmost importance, maybe the "dimple" is adequate to count the vote. John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next