Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scumbria who wrote (128933)	11/22/2000 1:10:13 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (1) of 1570344

Scumbria, When the question was "FL law allowance for recounts vs. the Tuesday submission deadline" all the Reps were weighing in with the fact that the SOS had no choice. Now that the laws conflict on a Bush question, discretion suddenly becomes the better part of valor. There is a big difference. The law on machine recounts, certification deadline and SOS flexibility in accepting late submissions is consistent. The legislator who is the author of the bill said that the intention of the law about manual recounts is in case the machinery malfunctions, and SOS was perfectly willing to accept late returns in case of mulfunction. On the other hand, the contradiction between federal and state law in postmarks is not really a contradiction. One law supersedes the other. I am not 100% sure but I think the federal law supersedes the state law in this instance. Maybe I will look it up. Joe

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next