SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 39.99-1.4%11:31 AM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ibexx who wrote (118817)11/22/2000 1:51:33 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (2) of 186894
 
Hi Ibexx,

FL election-related statute, 102.661 (5)(C), was the determining factor in today's FL Supreme Court ruling.

My interpretation is:

The Secretary of State (for Florida) did not abide by the FL Statute, and thus, did not appropriately apply discretion per today's SC ruling.

Here is the Florida Statute: 102.661 (5)(C)

(5) If the manual recount indicates an error in the vote tabulation which could affect the outcome of the election, the county canvassing board shall:
(c) Manually recount all ballots.
------------------
The definition of "error" is defined in 102.661 (4) (d), which is: they did a 1% manual recount of the ballots cast and found an "error in vote tabulation which could affect the outcome of the election"

The SOS issued "notices" to canvassing boards, in an attempt to unlawfully block the county canvassing boards that were executing on this Statute.

Regards,
Amy J
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News