Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Doo who wrote (36096)	11/22/2000 7:58:58 AM
From: dennis michael patterson	Read Replies (3) of 42787

Jeff, I have not read the opinion, but I have herd enough to answer your questions. As far as the court asserting that there is a justiciable issue, I have no doubt this assertion is incorrect. But given the pressure (and notoriety) of the moment, I can see them passing right by that issue and moving on to the substance. As for the substance, it is quite weak. It is injudicial and just name-calling to characterize the S of State's action as amounting to "disenfranchisement." The questions all involve reading the requisite statutes. On this score, it seems to me the court split the difference. Remember, during the questioing, it was clear that the issue of the deadline for having Flo's votes counted in the Electoral College was paramount. This seems to be the other side of the court's twin foci-- count and recount all votes within a short span of time. That said, I doubt this recount can be finished by Sunday. That is my hope.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next