Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dennis michael patterson who wrote (36098)	11/22/2000 8:45:15 AM
From: Doo	Read Replies (1) of 42787

Get your partisan head out from betwixt your cheeks and read the opinion. Final exam will be pass/fail. <gg> The Court had jurisdiction over the case, and nothing in the law says it does not have inherent authority to enjoin, sua sponte, the Secretarty of State from acting (as she declared she would) where the pending controversy directly questioned her authority to act. The statutory construction analysis of the Court is run-of-the-mill, well reasoned and principled. Isn't that what you Republicans want in a Supreme Court? Do you teach your students to base their legal decision on what they have heard about the law? Go read the opinion. Baker's comments this morning are almost as baseless as the arguments in the Republican briefs filed with the Fl. Sup. Ct. There's no "fiat", unfairness about the decision, and no federal question. Frivolous drivle, IMO. More importantly, tell me what you've got out to drink over the holiday weekend. :)

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next