OK, since you still don't get it, I'll have to spell it out for you.
1. The suspension of bigsablepoint was very consistent with the Terms of Use. It's cut and dried. No interpretation was necessary. She asked for it. You saw the post where she asked for it. I applaud SI for suspending her. She deserved it. She broke the rules, I strongly objected and showed my evidence. I'm an ordinary member of this site, just like you. What happened after I complained had nothing to do with me.
2. It was clear to me that her agenda was to spread disharmony and discord. I don't (and didn't) give a rat's ass about her "case" against Bush. You can read whatever nonsense you want to into what happened. I don't like people like that, and I won't sit idly by and watch that jazz and do nothing. That may be you, but that ain't me.
3. You boys are speaking in generalities. You state some opinion or rumor as if it were fact. You argue about smoke and mirrors. This makes it look like you can't tell the difference between something that somebody whispered to you, and something that you see happening in front of your eyes. You appear to be defending anything, as long as it results in something that makes you feel better.
4. I don't know know where you got the "expelled for life" crap. Any member of the site that is suspended or terminated can get back on the site under some circumstances. Ask Anthony@Pacific, he did it. I'm sure there are others.
5. Your reference here to "Auschwitz gestapo tactics" might be comical under some circumstances, but it simply points out that you have no idea what you are talking about. Comparing the suspension or termination of a member of this site for violating the Terms of Use of the site to systematic genocide of millions of innocent people by a group of psychotic murderers is simply bizarre. It points out a basic flaw in your logic process. It makes you look stupid, and in this case, it's offensive as well. If you aren't stupid, then why on earth would you want to look stupid?
6. If you had some understanding of the rules on the site, you might be in a better position to get the things done that you want done. Rather than read the rules, you rant about some imagined injustice that you don't understand. Rather than try and find out if there was some justice served, you stew in your hallucination and take it to whatever level your imagination wants you to take it to. You don't even realize that your "complaints" are not new to this site. They have come up now simply because the entire country is in Pissy Mode, thanks to the antics of some people that are, as we speak, sitting behind the antagonists and laughing at the chaos. You don't see this. It does not mean that nobody sees it, and it does not mean that it does not exist.
7. Your entire argument here, and your entire upset here, is totally based on two facts; first, you do not understand what is happening and you do not understand what happened, and second, you are guilty of the same things yourself and feel your "compatriot" bigsablepoint somehow legitimized your own crap.
I don't have anything against you guys. I really don't. Two years from now, this will all be a dim memory, and if you hold a grudge that long, you're not like me. But when you bring me into your movie, when you start attacking me because I refuse to agree to the bad film you are directing, you must understand that I am not reading your script. I'm not in your scene, and I'm not in your movie.
The one thing that you may have seen in your discourse with me is that I can be pushed quite a ways without getting cranky, but there comes a point where I don't back down when somebody unjustly attacks me.
This whole thing is simply a little microscopic example of what is happening in this country. You fellows would be better served to look to the high ground.
Why not work for something constructive? Why not do that?
By the way, did you hear that if George loses the election, his mom won't let him sit at the big table anymore? |
