Damn, you are a serious fact checker. I'm impressed, but unconvinced. And I seriously contest whether you've paid the least bit of attention to the last 2,000 years.
I know nothing about the historical facts of the rights of Judeans in the the first century B.C***. I understand that whole time thing has been thrown into a certain level of uncertainty. Kind of appropriate, in our way of thinking, n'est pas?
As to that Ciccione chick, (PC alert: I'm guilty) I've no doubt as to her choice. She waddnt about to vote for "Daddy's Buoy". Hello, anyone home? What am I saying? F*ck oh dear, H. sees W. as a real anchor at this state of the stent. Do you have a clue? If not, it's Herbert and Walker.
Should this joke of a post be where (beware) I expose the majesty of the system and dash you hopes that you are left a fragment of a hope that your candidate can prevail? Not. I simply want to wait for the moment when we can give your guy the election in a heartbeat. Because we can. Your side is playing the legal system on the basis of cafeteria jello, to quote a pundit. I'm seeing the majesty of the Madisonian system and I'm, in my heart of hearts, hoping your idiot dissembler wins, for the sake of keeping the Bratwurstglokl crowd out of the streets for a few years longer.
My complete understanding is that GWB is so hell-bent on icing the Bushie cake that he's not willing to allow the brown shirts to have their way.
Verstehen Sie? Raymond
***I'm lying through my teeth, and this is as close to the Republican Party that I will allow myself to come. |
