SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : AL GORE FOR PRESIDENT!
QQQ 632.92+0.8%Oct 28 4:00 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Don Pueblo who wrote (103)11/23/2000 8:38:57 AM
From: kha vu   of 119
 
stoptherecountpetition.org
By CATHERINE WILSON, Associated Press Writer

Judge Lawrence King, the chairperson of the Miami-Dade canvassing board, votes to stop the manual recount of ballots during a hearing at the Stephen P. Clark Goverment Center in Miami, Wednesday Nov (AP)
full photo


MIAMI (AP) - A state appeals court Wednesday night upheld a decision by an exhausted Miami-Dade election board to drop its manual recount. Democrats promised a quick appeal to Florida's Supreme Court.
The board decided to stop counting just hours after it agreed to examine just 10,750 disputed ballots among some 600,000 cast.

A state appeals court turned down a bid by Democrats to force the board and vote counters to resume the the recount and meet a Sunday deadline for completing it. In a four-page ruling, the three-judge panel wrote that the canvassing board had determined it couldn't meet the deadline and the court couldn't compel it to try and complete an impossible task.

The ruling is a serious blow to Al Gore's campaign, which sees Miami-Dade as a potential source of hundreds of votes that could help wipe out George W. Bush's 930-vote lead in official statewide totals.

Jenny Backus, a spokeswoman for the Democratic National Committee, said Democrats planned an appeal to the Florida Supreme Court. Steve Zack, a Democratic attorney, said that would probably be filed Thursday morning.

"The opinion simply said that if there's a problem in Dade County we should seek an equitable remedy with the state Supreme Court," Zack said. "The canvassing board had an a mandatory obligation to do this recount."

Republicans celebrated the appeals court decision

"This is a very significant step," said Bob Martinez, a lawyer for the GOP. The recount "was seriously sacrificing accuracy and disenfranchising voters."

The canvassing board's surprise decision to give up the hand count came earlier Wednesday - after a morning of protests and bickering over access. Board members said they didn't have time to do the job.

"It would be a minor feat and miracle for us to do it," board chairman Lawrence King said of the prospects of completing the review of 10,750 disputed ballots by the Sunday deadline set by the state Supreme Court. King choked up and apologized that the recount could not be completed.

Democrats asked the state appeals court to force the count to resume.

"The Miami-Dade canvassing board decision today to halt its recount - for whatever reason - flies in the face of an unambiguous, unanimous Supreme Court decision of less than 24 hours ago," the Democrats argued.

The board issued a legal response stating there was not enough time to accurately complete the recount by the deadline.

"We will abide by it," board attorney Murray A. Greenberg said of the court's decision.

GOP protesters who earlier were yelling angry slogans erupted into applause and cheers. At least one Bush supporter broke down in tears.

"I think the Miami-Dade canvassing board realized that the rush to judgment simply couldn't go on," said U.S. Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, R-Fla.

Early results of the Miami-Dade hand counts had showed Gore gaining 157 votes on Bush in the first 135 of 614 precincts recounted.

Miami-Dade - whose canvassing board has one Democrat, King, and two members who claim no party affiliation - had been on track to complete a full hand recount Dec. 1. But late Tuesday, the state Supreme Court said they must be completed five days earlier.

It was the second time the board had changed its mind about whether to conduct hand recounts. Last week the board initially voted 2-1 not to do any hand recounts. Then it decided to proceed with the recount when one member - Myriam Lehr - flipped her vote.

The board's earlier decision to stop the full hand count and focus only on the ballots with dimpled or partially separated chads - the tiny pieces of paper in perforated punchcard ballots - was met with a demonstration by Republicans.

About two dozen banged on the door of the room where the board was meeting, shouting "Voter fraud!" and "Cheaters!" They also swarmed a Democratic lawyer, and urged the police to arrest him for stealing a ballot. It turned out the ballot was a sample.

The board now is asking the Secretary of State to certify its earlier results from a machine count of ballots, plus the overseas totals and six Gore votes found in a sample recount last week, said elections supervisor David Leahy.

He said the three members had hoped to retire to a room on the 19th floor - a smaller place where they could have used machines to help count. But the Republicans and the media objected because they would have little access to watching the process.

Republicans had demanded that if the board makes any recount that it be all 654,000 ballots.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext