<it had nothing to do with the Clinton Administration, although, again, you'd like us to be convinced otherwise. I think most of us know, "its the Internet, stupid," and don't tell us that the Internet is Al's baby. That's another misconception you'd probably like us to believe here.<
Got a hanky? You need one you're frothing...
Did I say that Clinton was responsible for the market boom?
No, I said "I didn't realize Democrats were so bad for the markets"
Did I say Al Gore was responsible for the internet? No, you brought that up.
Since you'd like to debate...
<THIS particular Democrat has chosen to place his own PERSONAL interests and desire for power AHEAD of the interest of ALL Americans, which is have a President-elect and get on with then nation's and the world's business.<
Let me get this, Gore is putting his personal interest ahead of the nation because he won't concede, correct? And he should concede because he probably lost Florida by a few hundred votes? Correct?
Well, why hasn't Bush conceded "for the national interest"? After all, he lost the national vote by more than 300,000.
You imply that I'm some sort of big Gore supporter. Fine. I'm not, but, you can believe what you want. I didn't and don't like either of these guys. Voting for Gore required me to hold my nose. But, I'd rather have someone with a brain than a redux of "your Dad's presidency". Baker, Cheney...give me a break. Same guys that screwed up last time, now we get them with the dopey kid at the top.
To everyone else on the thread I apologize in advance for indulging myself... |
