SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: zonkie who wrote (87465)11/25/2000 6:18:50 PM
From: hdl  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
well u said it you won't change your mind. there were two statutes. the court and dems ignored that there were provisions for contest and for protest. now, both are discussed a lot. shall means sec of state had to certify by deadline. under other provision may means she could certify by deadline. court outrageously read shall as if she didn't have to. it outrageously read may as if she couldn't certify by the deadline. it ignored the lower court which found the facts. it didn't bother to find the lower court clearly erroneous-which is the standard. it didn't meet the standard to find sec of state abused her discretion.
i was up late night of decision and since. this post is from
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext