PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: zonkie who wrote (87529)	11/25/2000 7:26:11 PM
From: DOUG H	Read Replies (1) of 769667

Do you mean "ought to have" or has? He "ought" to have. Clearly he does'nt and he knows it. Do you mean ability or authority? He has both. as I said, lack of "moral authority" prevents him. Or are you willing to concede he just does'nt give a damn about them? Do you think he should also have the same reason to step in on behalf of his vice president? If he had stepped in on behalf of Gore I can just imagine what your arguments would be on that. That's a different matter. He has injected himself into that. He just won't stick up for his troops. To sum up. I think it's sad that the Commander in Chief is so distrusted and so indifferent to his troops right to vote he can't/won't act to see to it their rights are protected. It ain't that hard my friend.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next