SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 87.20-3.3%Nov 20 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: richard surckla who wrote (61839)11/26/2000 3:11:13 PM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
<<I could go on and on to tear down your straw house but I'm not going to do that. Instead I'm going to offer a solution. First throw out ALL the military ballotsand allow all foreign country ballots regardless of postmark. Then we should do a FIFTH (and in some cases a sixth) hand recount in the three Democrat counties that were selected by Gore. Include all dimpled, pimpled and pregnant ballots regardless of number of such marks as long as just one mark appears on Gore. Keep all the illegal ballots that were cast for Gore by felons, which they are doing at present. By doing these things, we will then be able to determine who the real winner is. I'm sure that this will meet with your approval along with other Democrats. Of course we could run into one problem... Bush still leading... we will then have to call for a SEVENTH hand recount!>>

Richard.
You keep talking about recounts, as if the machine recounts proved anything. The machine counts proved one thing and one thing only, they are grossly inaccurate.

At this point I am willing to settle for the following.

1)Count all overseas ballots, postmarked or not, all counties, provided that the other reasonable legalities are adhered to. Before you complain about the other legalities, I will let you, Richard, make the determination as reasonableness of the other legalities.

2)Manual recount the entire state of Florida

3)Do not count Dimpled ballots at all

4)Count every dangling chad or otherwise pierced ballot

This would be a count the nation could live with.
Would you settle for this?
I believe I am bending over backwards with this proposal.
I doubt that Bush would be for it. I bet Gore would accept this, except posslbly the part about you being the sole judge of rules pertaining to overseas ballots.

You said it was not Gore's place to offer a recount of the entire state. On this WE agree, but why couldn't Bush have just said "Yes this is acceptable to me but we will leave it up to the courts to decide whether or not this is legal under Florida law." He would have looked better in EVERONE's eyes wouldn't he?

He did not say this for one reason and one reason only.
He thought he could lose if it happened. You know it and I know it.

Would you be willing to accept the above proposal as outlined. Yes, or no?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext