SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lawdog who wrote (88334)11/26/2000 4:36:57 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
A dimpled chad is only acceptable in Texas if both or all candidates request a manual recount and one would infer that both or all agree that the manual recount is more accurate using the rules for a manual recount. If both or all parties do not agree then no manual recount occurs and no dimpled ballots are counted.

I know democats want selective counts and selective use of that laws of a state to prove whatever.

The law clearly states' the preference applies only when (1) two or more parties are requesting the recount and (2) the parties requesting the recount note in their application for a recount pursuant to section 214.042-A difference in the type of recount requested.

Just another correction of wrong Boise the democrat spin.

Tom Watson tosiwmee

thanks again mike
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News