SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : G&K Investing for Curmudgeons
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike Buckley who wrote (8798)11/27/2000 6:12:49 AM
From: unclewest  Read Replies (2) of 22706
 
I'm pleased with the way the courts have essentially let the state's laws and common sense prevail. About the latter, the state Supreme Court took into account critical timing issues that ensure that a vote be certified in time for the electoral college to do its thing.

I think the Justices used the law to do as they saw fit to abide by the spirit of Florida law and I also think it's appropriate that it be contested in the federal Supreme Court. I think that because the entire process also is the law. That's why I don't think any of this is "interference." Instead, it's the process our laws set forth.

hey nitpicker,
ok...you win...inteference may not have been the appropriate word.

since i essentially agree with you...i obviously meant to say what you said above.

the supreme court is generally the final arbitrator of our constitutional rights. rulings by them should help set standards for the future...hopefully precluding this mess from happening again.

now go nitpick your nose.
uw
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News