Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neenny who wrote (440)	11/27/2000 11:36:43 AM
From: mph	Read Replies (3) of 14610

It did strike me funny. I'd really like to see this whole thing end sooner than later. It's divisive and unsettling. The notion that a purely subjective interpretation of a voter's intent (which has at least a 50% margin of error) is essential to a fair election seems preposterous to me. I'm, of course, referring to dimpled and pregnant chads of various order. There is nothing clear and convincing about most of these marks or almost marks on the ballots. In the rare instances where every person who views the ballot is in agreement, then maybe.... but that is rare. The civil preponderance of evidence standard requires a showing of better than 50/50 probability. I wonder what Gore will say at noon EST.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next