Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JungleInvestor who wrote (80109)	11/27/2000 12:24:23 PM
From: kodiak_bull	Read Replies (3) of 95453

Jungle, That WSJ editorial is certainly one of the more confused efforts they have put together. I'm surprised the Supreme Court took this case at this time, but the issue is not a political one but rather a constitutional one, at least as I see it. The court will most likely make its decision on the narrowest grounds possible, and perhaps make no decision at all. If it rules, it should simply rule on the unconstitutionality (equal protection) of voters when a small segment of the electorate is permitted special or changing privileges in an election. CNN has a particularly dense "political analyst" John Schneider, clearly a Democrat apologist, who can't wait to slant each outcome with the Gore talking point. He keeps saying the Supes (the real ones, not the 7 Dwarves in Tallahassee) are going to act politically. Not so, imho. Bought some FLC this morning, pretty much a full position on them right now. I would like to find an election rally to lighten up on some of these positions, but think the earliest we see that in the oils is Wednesday, perhaps Friday, or maybe next week.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next