Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Original Mad Dog who wrote (458)	11/27/2000 6:52:54 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (1) of 14610

Either they had the discretion to engage in the hand count or not. If they chose not to go forward, I would think that would be it. Bear in mind that manual recounts are not mandatory in the first place. If they were essential to a fair election and thought to yield the most accurate outcome, they would be mandatory in all instances. Doesn't this make some sense? To me the real problem is in the court of public opinion and how all of this will ultimately be spun to undermine whomever is ultimately declared the winner. Where is Regis when you need him. Is this your FINAL answer?<g>

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next