SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (129119)11/27/2000 11:04:19 PM
From: Petz  Read Replies (1) of 1570283
 
ted & Jozeph - I think you guys are arguing over the NET
GAIN in Gore votes vs. the raw gain in Gore votes.

But here's something I find interesting - even in Broward
county, Bush picked up MORE VOTES THAN GORE, adjusted for
the number of original votes for each candidate. Here's the
numbers:
BUSH GORE
OFFICIAL 'RECOUNT' NUMBERS: 177,323 386,561
HAND RECOUNT CHANGE: 579 1,146
FOREIGN ABSENTEE CHANGE: 37 53
CERTIFIED TOTAL: 177,939 387,760

In other words, for each 100,000 machine votes recounted,
Bush picked up 326.5 votes, but Gore only picked up 296.5
votes.

So, have at it, GORE! Let's recount the whole state! Doing
that should give Bush an extra 90 vote margin.

Indeed! If we did that across the whole country, your lead
in the popular vote would DISAPPEAR.

EDIT - with this kind of weak-fingered voting by
Republicans, it is highly unlikely that Gore would gain ANY
votes whatsover in Miami Dade, which had a 53:47 vote ratio.
Lots of elderly republicans in the precincts they saved for
last.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext