SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Quinn who wrote (14076)11/28/2000 11:41:10 AM
From: Phil Jones  Read Replies (2) of 14627
 
100% agreement on that, Quinn. I've been thinking along the same lines. Even those who got in at 60c are losers at the current price. You'd think that CMS would make some announcement about Diablillos or possible new sites that the firm might be involved with -- or even give out a weather report -- just to show that PFG's management is still functioning and sees some future for the company. Maybe she's still in shock -- like most of the rest of us. I still find it very hard to understand how so much could be above the ground, and so little below. Not being a geologist, I'm assuming that what happened at Luicho is understandable to geologists. As a layperson, I can't see why the gold on the surface doesn't bear some relation to what's under it! Phil
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News