SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mike Buckley who wrote (35582)11/28/2000 11:08:15 PM
From: Joshua Corbin  Read Replies (1) of 54805
 
If the Naz ends the year where it ended today, the average annual growth in 1999 and 2000 is 11.8%.

If that 12.25% growth rate kicks in now, a linear increase would put us at NAZ 5,000 in 2006 and 6,000 in 2008.

Compared to last year, that's boredom city, right? Keep running the numbers and it gets interesting:

A 30-year old could cash in his IRAs at 65 well above NAZ 150,000 -- or about a 5500% gain on the index. If the biotech blue skys really happens, he could keep the meter running for a decade or two longer; numbers that high boggle my mind.

(At least I think that's right. Precalculus was a long time ago.)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News