Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Pacific Rim Mining V.PFG

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Phil Jones who wrote (14077)	11/29/2000 1:24:24 AM
From: charred	Read Replies (1) of 14627

"Maybe she's still in shock -- like most of the rest of us" and "Not being a geologist, I'm assuming that what happened at Luicho is understandable to geologists" Not true. All you had to do is cut through the BS. I am a geologist who tried to explain the problems here and I was called a basher. When they said 8200 samples averaged 1.5 grams Au, then in the same NR they say of the 8200 samples, 1300 samples average 6.6 grams Au, simple math shows the rest is below cutoff grade. 0.25 to be correct. Also sampling parallel to the strike does not show the true grade. All this was said on this thread before the drilling. PFG at the moment is a joke. This world class management should have know better.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next