SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: pater tenebrarum who wrote (41616)11/29/2000 8:17:43 AM
From: re3  Read Replies (2) of 436258
 
I have a moral question for you. This is an imaginary
situation, but I think it is fun to decide what one would do.

The situation: You are in the Midwest, and there is a huge
flood in progress. Many homes have been lost, water supplies
compromised and infrastructures destroyed.

Let's say that you're a photographer out getting still
photos for a news service, traveling alone, looking for
particularly poignant scenes.

You come across George W. Bush who has been swept away by
the floodwaters. He is barely hanging on to a tree limb and is about to
go
under.
You can either put down your camera and save him, or take a
Pulitzer Prize winning photograph of him as he loses his grip on the
limb.

So, here's the question and think carefully before you
answer the question below:

Which lens would you use?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News