Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 226.94

-1.7%

9:38 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Math Junkie who wrote (40176)	11/30/2000 5:03:36 PM
From: willcousa	Read Replies (1) of 70976

She had two decisions to make. One, to comply with or disregard the statutory due date and two, to comply with or disregard the state s ct. deadline. She complied with both. You can argue that one or the other was bad law but she had a reasonable rationale for both and was on very shaky ground to disregard either. If she disregarded either date she was going to be in court so fast her head would spin and her decision would be the sole focus of the inquiry. The way she went the statute and the court decision are the primary foci of the inquiry.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next