SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: chic_hearne who wrote (42728)11/30/2000 8:35:04 PM
From: marginmike  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
Chic for argument sake I think some of your numbers are unrealisticly low. Ie I think you asigned Qcom a $10 value. Qcom will make 1 billion next year, at a 25-30Pe which for a growth stock is a fair valuation its still worth 35-40. Qcom has 4 billion in cash and investement(2/3rds cash) thats about 4-5 a share alone. I am not saying Naz cant go to 1800 or even 1500(I doubt it) triple digits is unrealistic. The Japenese buble which was similear to Naz only came down 60% off their highs and they did not have near the innovative new business's we have now. their banking system was way more hollow as well
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News