Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Webster Groves who wrote (80364)	11/30/2000 9:51:05 PM
From: heraclitus	Read Replies (1) of 95453

WG, Isn't USU doing enrichment? Also, if the fed would take the spent fuel and reprocess it as they do in France, the fuel cycle would be more cost effective. There is a lot of U-235 left in spent fuel as well as all of the fissionable plutonium that is produced during reactor operation ("breeding"). I agree that no new nukes will be built for a long time. I do not think any utility wants to take on the short sighted energy department or the "greens". Maybe the next nuke will actually have the "greens" blessing when they realize it is the most environmentally friendly means of large scale power production. regards homer

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next