SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: maverick61 who wrote (97120)12/1/2000 1:51:48 PM
From: lawdog  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
That is objective. If you had read my theory on the reason the Court took this case you would know the basis for my theory. The questioning in the Court was one small part of my probabilities. There will be intense pressure for a unanimous verdict. I was surprised by O'Conner's sympathy for the Bush position. However, Bush/Baker took a low shot at the Florida Court system with their rhetoric and lack of respect for the judicial branch. The Court will send Bush packing and people like you will have a hard time figuring out a reason to criticize it, but I'm sure you will.

The Court would have never taken this case if not for Bush's thoughtless and irresponsible criticisms of a State's Supreme Court. This is just the kind of case that the Court typically shrinks from. There is only one reason the Court would hear it, to shut up Bush's incessant and ridiculous whining about unfairness and partiality that does not exist.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News