Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Electoral College 2000 - Ahead of the Curve

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (4219)	12/1/2000 8:14:41 PM
From: TraderGreg	Read Replies (2) of 6710

Now, now...I know that just because one is paranoid doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. Look, we have employed Socratic(you) and Aristotelian(me) logic on this baby. 1. The US SC clearly feels the Congress is the ultimate arbiter, not penultimate but ULTIMATE, PRIMO. 2. Jeb Bush has already signed off on Harris' certification of 25 electoral votes for the state of FL, pledged to Bush. 3. No recount, no court ruling, nothing can force Jeb Bush to place his John Hancock on any other set of electors. 4. So let this shadow slate of Electors be submitted to the Congress. I AM TELLING YOU THAT EVEN IF THERE WERE 395 DEMOCRATIC MEMBERS OF CONGRESS, THEY ARE REQUIRED BY TITLE 3 SEC. 15 OF THE US CODE TO ACCEPT THE SLATE THAT IS SIGNED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE STATE, NAMELY THE SLATE THAT HAS THE SIGNATURE OF ONE JOHN ELLIS BUSH, GOVERNOR OF THE SOVEREIGN STATE OF FLORIDA. 5. The Congress has THE final word on this. While this will be terrific material to use against Republicans in future elections, it's time for the Dems to do their best Douglas McArthur imitation and retreat vowing to return some day. TG

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next