SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Al Gore vs George Bush: the moderate's perspective
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: david james who wrote (8218)12/2/2000 12:58:18 PM
From: ThirdEye  Read Replies (1) of 10042
 
One (maybe not so) little wrinkle in the Seminole case is that the infractions occurred BEFORE the election, so it's not clear to me that anyone could argue that throwing out those ballots would be a change in the rules AFTER the election. That said, if the lower court throws out those ballots, the Republicans would be in the FLSC arguing to change the rules AFTER the election, after going to the USSC aguing the reverse. If the lower court accepts those ballots, the Democrats will be the ones in the FLSC arguing that the rules CAN'T be changed AFTER the election.

OH, the irony!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News