Zeev,
Dave, so far as I know, no court has determined that Billy actually lied under oath (about the blow job), the house indicted, but the Senate let him go free. Thus, like OJ, we really do not know if he lied under oath,
That actually wasn't the issue that started this discussion again (whether or not he was guilty, that is). It was Scumbria's inherent claim that he was indicted for the sex, not for the lying, which was an invalid claim. He was impeached for lying under oath.
as i mentioned to you before, there are some schools of thought (religions) that do not consider a "blow job" a "sexual relationship",
There are also schools of thought (religions) that think it's okay to shrink heads. Unfortunately, you were not able to offer any evidence that either of these religions apply to Bill Clinton. When I asked for leads to recreate your research, you then claimed your wife had done the research and were not able to supply any for me to follow up on.
What has that to do with the price of the "Bu$$".
I don't know. I thought it was a dead issue again until Scumbria posted to me this morning.
Dave
p.s. Also, my congratulations to Carl for his call. And while I don't mean to belittle his achievement, there were many, many stocks that turned at the same time. I'd say that his achievement was calling a bottom overall, and it was an excellent call. |
