WDC/Sandisk Corporation Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation

WDC 156.15

-4.6%

10:45 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (16927)	12/3/2000 6:08:37 AM
From: Craig Freeman	Read Replies (3) of 60323

<OT> <or is it?> I read every word of the U.S. Supreme Court transcript and have learned something new. It seems, that Article II of the U.S. Constitution denies individuals the right to vote for the U.S. Presidency. Rather, it assures that the States have the right to do whatever they choose when it comes time to send "electors" to the Electoral College. In short, WE elect our State Congressman and Senators and then THEY have the power to vote for the President. Our individual votes for President aren't guaranteed to mean a thing! IMHO, Anyone would have thought that you could stop a kid in the street and ask him whether his daddy's vote for President counts -- and he would say "Yes!". But that's not true. His daddy's vote is measured by the rules within the State in which he resides. Per an earlier U.S. Supreme Court ruling, individuals have no right to vote for the President unless the State in which they reside chooses to grant it to them. By this ruling, I suppose that the State Legistlature could choose to say "we have decided not to count votes for the U.S. President this year and instead shall use a dartboard to decide which electors we shall send to Washington D.C". I don't know what the U.S. Supreme Court will say when it rules in the next few days. But somehow I feel poorer for knowing that my power to vote for the President in not "one vote among many" but rather "whatever the State wants it to be". If Bush wins, he will probably say that everything played out fairly. I hope that the Seminole Indian absentee ballots are tossed out. Because then Gore will win and then HE will be stuck with the job of explaining to me why my Presidential vote wasn't worth a damn no matter who I happened to choose. Because ... when someone ... anyone ... can do that ... perhaps the markets will become ordinarly once again. Craig PS If it was up to me, I would change the "Electoral College" so that the states had the same number of EC votes but that they didn't need to send real humans to Congress. Rather, it would be a "Federal" election (governed by Federal Law) ... with the electors being decided by dividing the total of all votes within any one state by their EC votes. Instead of "all-or-nothing", we would then have something close to a popular vote, except that "getting the vote out bigtime" in Vermont wouldn't mess up the totals. This would GREATLY reduce the chances of the current nonsense repeating itself again.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next