PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: sunshadow who wrote (99237)	12/3/2000 7:35:43 AM
From: sunshadow	Read Replies (2) of 769667

In a brisk exchange with the Gore mouthpiece, Professor Laurence Tribe, Justice O'Connor scoffed at the theory that the Florida court was simply engaging in some routine judicial review. It should have occurred to them, she remarked, "that it might be in the state's best interest not to go around changing the law after the election". (Daily Telegraph- UK) The FLSC did change the law (cannot do) and did so after the election (definitely cannot do). Should (by all that is right and proper) be a 9-0 ruling, but will not be. I will be ok with a 5-4 ruling. Not sure I understand the pundits saying that such a vote would tear the divided country even further apart... The 4 judicial activists on the court are the problem, not the issue before the court. Our founders purposefully made the Judicial branch of government the weakest. It's past time to steer back in that direction. Courts exist to rule on what already exists, not create what they think ought to exist.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next