SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: MKTBUZZ who started this subject12/3/2000 2:48:36 PM
From: Mighty_Mezz  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
from an editorial by Robert Parry
=====
Florida’s strict absentee ballot law seems to prohibit outsiders from
altering information on absentee forms, though the county officials
argue that the changes were merely technical revisions.

...

So, in Seminole County, the Bush camp is arguing that technical
legal provisions should not prevent ballots from being counted, a
seemingly contradictory stance from its position before the U.S.
Supreme Court.

...

If a technical deadline is so important that votes cast for Gore must
be thrown out in Broward, doesn’t if follow that a technical violation
on ballots for Bush should be discarded in Seminole? Is it fair to
change the rules of the game for some and not for others?

Cynics, however, might expect that the Reagan-Bush appointees on
the U.S. Supreme Court simply would search out a whole new set of
cherished constitutional legal principles.

Those new principles would explain why technical election-law
provisions must take precedence when they help George W. Bush
win the White House, but should be set aside if they help Al Gore.
====
consortiumnews.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext