SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CRay33 who wrote (99431)12/3/2000 2:53:48 PM
From: PartyTime  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
CRay, you wrote:

"The ballot irregularities will happen equal for Bush and Gore, since it is mechanical and not subjective.

"Why should they ONLY recount the irregularities in heavily democratic districts?"

CRay, I believe you just answered your own question. Mr. Bush didn't, within the 72-hour period Florida election law requires, request a hand recount in any Republican counties.
He had the same right as Mr. Gore had. Mr. Gore requested the hand count and Gore, as a candidate down only 327 votes out of six million cast, should have gotten the recount. We're in court today, because Bush used Harris to circumvent what Florida law allowed.

Even in consideration to the above, Mr. Gore, early on in the controversy agreed to a statewide recount. Mr. Bush, once again, declined.

Can't you realistically see that this situation ONLY exists because of the Jeb Bush-Katherine Harris connection? This would not have happened in any other state, except maybe Texas. And if it did happen in Texas, Texas law allows for hand recounts in close elections.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext