Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 228.87

-2.7%

3:56 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Fred Levine who wrote (40376)	12/3/2000 6:03:41 PM
From: daryll40	Read Replies (1) of 70976

Fred, Yes I am a partisan. Nevertheless, your comment about a republican and a democratic observer is STILL misleading. There were MANY ballots that the republican "observed" as being merely dimpled, pregnant or pimples. Just because they were "observed" does not mean he has the right to throw that ballot out. And even if the republican observer DOES agree that UNDER THE RULES that the canvassing board established the vote is a Gore vote, the bottom line real issue here is HOW DO THOSE RULES COME TO BE? It would seem to me that they should use the same rules as used in the past...if they want to change those rules it should be ONLY FOR FUTURE ELECTIONS. So that is the real issue. A handjob in theory is fine but not when there will be shenanagins of dimpled, pimpled or pregnant ballots counting as votes. Daryll40

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next