SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: gao seng who wrote (99935)12/4/2000 9:16:22 AM
From: Ellen  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
I see no need.

Then why did you ask?
It was, after all, your initial presentation/argument.

Oh, I get it, you can't be bothered but you will try to bother someone else to do your legwork.

I am not the one denying his statement.

Why is it that you cannot distinguish between questioning something and denying it?

I asked about the case's reference to Florida's constitution - and looked up and posted the links to it.
Not only could you not be 'bothered' to answer the question (too difficult?) but you wanted me to look up your references to the state statutes!!

Weak, gao.

I find it curious that you will accept what one judge says. If Judge Rehnquist's opinion is part of the majority opinion, then that would validate your emphasis of his individual position. But the court's ruling as a whole is what is important.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News