SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: chalu2 who wrote (100182)12/4/2000 12:33:17 PM
From: Mr. Palau  Read Replies (4) of 769667
 
The decision was not reversed, it was vacated, which means the fl sct was told to clarify their decision. Now it's back to the FL SCt to clarify whether their reference to the state constitution was critical to their decision. If they say that their decision is fully supported by state statutory construction principles and legislative intent, then I think the US Supreme Court will stay out of it, and the state court decision will stand. If this distinction didnt matter, the court could have resolved it. My bet: the fl sct court clarifies their opinion to make clear that it can stand on statutory construction/intent principles alone, removing any federal question. This does not take the heat off of sauls, and does nothing o move Gore closer to a concession, at least until the fl sct revisits the issue. By then they may have sauls' decision as well, and could resolve the whole thing by the end of the week.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News