SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dealer who started this subject12/4/2000 12:39:02 PM
From: t2  Read Replies (2) of 65232
 
I think the Supreme Court ruling was viewed as not a loss to Gore according to his people. To me that means it was a loss to Gore if one reads between the lines.

I think Judge was going to rule against him anyways. Now I just think he took the opportunity to work on making his decision tougher to overturn. This supreme court thing was just his opportunity to justify taking a little longer in a decision that is supposed to done ASAP.

Now he can look at whether Gore's time limit for contesting was over. I just think he wants to avoid issuing a ruling against Gore that could be interpretted as saying that Gore's contest was made in time; setting up for appeal.
This way he can reject on two counts---
1. too late
2. without merit.

Hope this is over today.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News