Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting

QCOM 171.02

-1.5%

Dec 31 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Keith Feral who wrote (5206)	12/4/2000 2:03:31 PM
From: tradeyourstocks	Read Replies (7) of 197056

Let me try again: post spinout QClassic wouldn't need any addition IP, so why does the TI x-license involve QClassic? I doubt (hope not) that Irwin gave up the farm today, but without more details it sure sounds like TI can make chips for any standard royalty free. I'm sure that TI's customers who will build handsets (Nokia) would pay royalties to Q but if TI gets to sell royalty free then Q just dropped the overall royalty rate. Someone explain to me that I'm completely wrong, please.<g> MicroE

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next