SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD)
AMD 203.15-0.8%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TechieGuy-alt who wrote (21462)12/4/2000 3:10:36 PM
From: PetzRead Replies (1) of 275872
 
TG, no one seems to have noticed that, in an effort to get more Gigamines, Intel has raised the Vcc to 1.76 volts on Coppermines with a "B" designation.

Yet the voltage ID pins on these new Gigamines call for 1.7 volts. If the power supply delievers 1 millivolt too little voltage, the "B" version won't work. (Anything above 1.8 and its a crispy critter.)

Of course, this means that special motherboards are needed for the "B" version, since a normal motherboard would supply 1.7 volts +- 0.05 volts, giving you a 51% chance of a working system.

The thermal problem with this unit is even worse than the original Gigamine, since to dissipates an extra 3 watts but still needs to keep Tj at 70C or lower.

This very much reminds me of original 0.35 K6 at end of life. Remember there were special 2.4 volt parts made just for some OEM's? Paul hooted about that for weeks.

The Intel November datasheet in which I discoverd the "B" part is linked to at developer.intel.com
The direct link to the datasheet is ftp://download.intel.com/design/PentiumIII/datashts/24526407.pdf
The datasheet refers to an S-spec "SL4WM." It appears that my access to Intel specs has been blocked, perhaps someone else can find the s-spec document.

Petz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext