SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jlallen who wrote (103535)12/6/2000 5:35:22 PM
From: lawdog  Read Replies (2) of 769667
 
HYPO WARNING - HYPO WARNING - HYPO WARNING

So, you can honestly tell us that if the Democrats had been granted private and exclusive access to a very areas containing sensitive information, that the Democrats had been allowed to alter ballot applications to make them comply with the law, that this act was not only illegal but it constituted a felony, the Republicans were denied similar rights and privileges, that the election in question depended on the slimmest of margins with strong evidence that the GOP candidate actually won the election and your candidate did win the national popular vote that you would just say "Oh well"?

You don't actually expect us to believe this, do you?

Now, let's say the above happened and you were really angry. What remedy do you think puts those disenfranchsied Republican voters back in the position they would have been in had no illegal act of favoritism had been done.

Remember, JLA, this is a hypo just like from your law school days. I want to know what you would recommend if you were the attorney on this case.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext